Was it dengue?

Thanks to some archaic thing called the Communicable Diseases Act, the government has monopoly control of a lot of public health information. I.e. if three people die of plague in your school or neighbourhood, the hospital or clinic that tried to treat and cure them is not allowed to tell anyone that they are handling dengue cases. Instead, they have to report it to BBMP as a ‘suspected dengue’ case, which will be verified by another fossil called the National Institute of Virology in Hyderabad, after which dengue will be confirmed. If any hospital violates this protocol, it will get a warning from the government (has already happened a few times).

I understand that the government does not want to create panic in the city, by making people think there is a big problem. But I fail to understand why accurate and public data should add to the panic. If anything, it should reduce the worry levels, and help citizens understand the exact nature and extent of the problem. The mai baap sarkar, however, operates on the assumption that the "government knows what is good for you more than you know yourself".

Now, we may not mind some of this too much if the government did a good job of maintaining public health information. But it does not. Instead, it just stops you and me from doing it, and quietly buries its own responsibility for alerting the public. This has to change.

As for the two kids who died yesterday, I really would like to know if they had dengue. I would like to know which parts of the city are more prone to dengue than others. And if no one in BBMP can answer these questions, I want something more sensible and useful than "we are processing the case, and have not yet reached a conclusion". I have – BBMP can’t process these cases!!

What worries me even more is that when a patient who is ‘suspected’ to have a communicable illness dies before the virology test is complete, they seem to abandon the test, saying, "What’s the point? The guy’s dead anyway." This is ridiculous. The public health value of the tests must be made more prominent. Being silent about a ‘communicable’ disease is a bit of an oxymoron, anyway.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

We’re paying the price for digging holes around the ground we stand on

For years together, people talked about the 'demographic dividend'. Thanks to high fertility ratios in the past, a large number of young people would be entering the workforce, and we as yet don't have a very large aged population, so the ratio of workers to non-workers would be favourable. It would boost economic activity and taxes, and allow us to make investments in many public goods and services. This was not a bad picture to paint. But it had one important assumption - namely, that the young people entering the workforce would be skilled and productive. But we totally missed…

Similar Story

Of plumbers, slumber and economic development

If there's a leak in the water line in your building, you'll call the plumber. You won't call the carpenter and hope that by a combination of luck, brute force, learning-on-the-job, prayer, etc. he'll somehow get the job done. But when it comes to governance, we don't use this basic filter. We put the wrong people in charge of problem solving, and endlessly debate why they should be nonetheless able to solve them. They can't. The sooner we admit it the better. Structure matters. The internal capacity of organisations makes a difference. Being alert to larger trends and learning from…